Key points at a glance
- § 8 Abs. 1 StBerG requires you to inform factually about your activity. Soliciting specific individual engagements is, however, permitted for bookkeeping activities (§ 8 Abs. 2).
- You may call yourself “Buchhalter:in” and advertise with the qualifications “Geprüfte:r Bilanzbuchhalter:in” (certified accountant), “Bachelor Professional in Bilanzbuchhaltung” or “Steuerfachwirt:in” (certified tax specialist) (§ 8 Abs. 4).
- The BGH (Federal Court of Justice) has classified terms such as “Finanzbuchhaltung” (financial accounting) and “Einrichtung der Buchführung” (setting up the books) as misleading. “Buchhaltungsservice” (bookkeeping service) is only permitted with a clear restriction in words; a reference to a section of the law is not enough.
- Reviews are allowed if they are genuine; you must state whether and how you check their authenticity (§ 5b Abs. 3 UWG).
- Telephone and email outreach is governed by § 7 UWG: email only with consent, calls to businesses only with presumed consent.
This post is general information, not legal or tax advice for your individual case. Laws, professional guidelines and chamber fees change: check the details with your chamber, the relevant authority or your professional association before you make a decision.
Three rules from § 8 StBerG
In § 8 StBerG, the Steuerberatungsgesetz (StBerG, Tax Advisory Act) contains its own advertising provision, which applies to everyone who provides assistance in tax matters, including bookkeepers under § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 StBerG. It can be boiled down to three rules:
Inform factually
You may draw attention to your services insofar as you inform factually about your activity in form and content (§ 8 Abs. 1). Sensationalist superlatives, competitions or aggressive discount campaigns do not fit with this.
You may actively seek individual engagements
The ban on soliciting an engagement in an individual case expressly does not apply to bookkeeping activities under § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 (§ 8 Abs. 2). So you may write directly to a trade business and make it an offer for ongoing bookkeeping.
Titles and the UWG
You may refer to your powers, call yourself “Buchhalter” and advertise with recognised qualifications. The law makes clear, however, that the Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG, Act against Unfair Competition) applies without restriction (§ 8 Abs. 4).
That last sentence is the key. Almost all disputes are not about the Tax Advisory Act itself but about the UWG's ban on misleading statements: an offer must not create an impression that goes beyond what you are actually allowed to do.
What the courts have decided
| Court and date | Case | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| BGH, 12.7.2001, I ZR 261/98 | A bookkeeping service advertised “Finanzbuchführung”, “Finanzbuchhaltung”, “Lohnabrechnung” (payroll) and “Einrichtung der Buchführung”. | Misleading: the terms suggest comprehensive bookkeeping that was not permitted. |
| OLG Karlsruhe, 22.1.2014, 6 U 45/13 | Letterhead “Mobiler Buchhaltungsservice i.S. § 6 StBerG” (mobile bookkeeping service; lower instance of the 2015 BGH ruling). | Misleading: bookkeeping also includes tasks reserved for tax advisers; a mere reference to § 6 StBerG does not explain this to laypeople. |
| BGH, 25.6.2015, I ZR 145/14 | Letterhead “Mobiler Buchhaltungsservice i.S. § 6 StBerG”; the claimant was the Steuerberaterkammer Nordbaden. | Confirms the OLG: the designation is not prohibited per se, but the misleading impression must be removed. A reference to a section of the law is not enough for that. |
| BFH, 7.6.2017, II R 22/15 | Dispute over whether self-employed bookkeepers may prepare VAT pre-returns. | Not permitted; so this service may not be advertised either. |
The OLG Karlsruhe based this on an earlier BGH decision on the term “Buchführungsbüro” (bookkeeping office) (GRUR 2008, 815): anyone who advertises with “Buchführung” must at the same time make it unmistakably clear that only a limited scope is meant. In short: the courts ask what an average small business owner understands. That person does not know § 6 StBerG, but does know the word “Buchhaltung”, and thinks of everything up to the balance sheet.
Terms that work, and terms that cause trouble
How to get it right
- “Laufende Buchhaltung: Buchen Ihrer laufenden Geschäftsvorfälle” (ongoing bookkeeping: posting your current business transactions)
- “Laufende Lohn- und Gehaltsabrechnung mit Lohnsteuer-Anmeldung” (ongoing payroll with wage tax returns)
- “Setting up a chart of accounts for your business” (expressly permitted since 1.9.2026)
- “Document organisation, open items list and dunning”
- “We prepare your records for your tax adviser”
Better avoid
- “Finanzbuchhaltung komplett” (complete financial accounting) or “Rundum-Buchhaltung” (all-round bookkeeping)
- “Einrichtung Ihrer Buchführung” (setting up your books)
- “VAT pre-returns included”
- “Annual accounts”, “EÜR” (cash-basis profit statement) or “tax return” as a service of your own
- “Buchhaltungsservice i.S.d. § 6 StBerG” as the only restriction
In 2001, the BGH also objected to “Lohnabrechnung” (payroll) without an addition. Use the wording of the law, “laufende Lohnabrechnung” (ongoing payroll). It is precise and shows that you know your limits, which tends to build trust with cautious business owners rather than cost it.
How to word the restriction properly
The clarification must appear where the impression is created. If “Buchhaltungsbüro” is in your logo, it needs an asterisk and an easily readable footnote on the same page. If “Buchhaltung” is a menu item, the first sentences of the service page describe what is included and what is not. An example of an introductory text:
A text like this meets the requirements of the case law and is good marketing at the same time: it describes the benefit, presents the cooperation with tax advisers as a strength and avoids jargon nobody understands. What the matching imprint looks like is explained in the article on the imprint for bookkeepers.

Using titles and qualifications correctly
- You may use “Buchhalter:in” under § 8 Abs. 4 StBerG if you meet the requirements of § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1. You are not obliged to.
- “Geprüfte:r Bilanzbuchhalter:in” only with the IHK (Chamber of Industry and Commerce) qualification. Do not drop the “Geprüft” (certified), and ideally name the IHK where you took the examination.
- “Bachelor Professional in Bilanzbuchhaltung” is the equivalent title for the same qualification. Do not shorten it to “Bachelor”, because that would suggest an academic degree.
- “Steuerfachwirt:in” is also permitted as an advertising title, but does not authorise tax advice.
- “Steuerberater:in” (tax adviser), “Steuerbevollmächtigte:r” and variations are protected under criminal law (§ 132a StGB). “Steuerbüro” (tax office) or “Steuerservice” (tax service) in the name is also generally misleading for bookkeepers, because it suggests a power they do not have.
Reviews, references and client names
Reviews are an important signal for bookkeeping offices, because prospective clients can hardly judge the quality of the work in advance. Since 2022, the UWG has set out more precisely what applies. If you show reviews on your website, you must state whether and how you ensure that they come from real customers (§ 5b Abs. 3 UWG). Fake or bought reviews, and the unsupported claim that all reviews are genuine, are always prohibited under the annex to the UWG (Nos. 23b and 23c).
Bookkeepers do not have a statutory duty of confidentiality like tax advisers. Even so: only publish names, logos or quotes of clients with express consent, if only because of contractual confidentiality and data protection. You may actively ask for Google reviews, but without offering anything in return and without selecting only satisfied clients. A QR code for Google reviews on the invoice or at the closing meeting makes it easy. More on this in the article on the Google Business Profile.
Outreach: letter, phone, email and Google Ads
Because § 8 Abs. 2 StBerG does not prohibit soliciting individual engagements for bookkeeping activities, you have more options than tax advisers. The limits are set by § 7 UWG:
| Channel | To businesses | To consumers |
|---|---|---|
| Letter | Permitted as long as there is no recognisable objection | Permitted as long as there is no recognisable objection |
| Telephone | Only with at least presumed consent | Only with prior express consent |
| Email, newsletter | Only with prior express consent; exception for existing customers under § 7 Abs. 3 | Only with prior express consent; exception for existing customers under § 7 Abs. 3 |
Courts interpret a business's presumed consent to marketing calls narrowly; a general need for bookkeeping is usually not enough. A traditional letter to businesses in your region is therefore often the safer route. For Google Ads: the ad copy is advertising within the meaning of § 8 StBerG. “Buchhaltung Leipzig: laufende Buchungen und Lohnabrechnung” (bookkeeping Leipzig: ongoing entries and payroll) is unproblematic, “Steuererklärung günstig” (cheap tax return) is not, even if the landing page then restricts it correctly. For visibility without an ad budget, the article on local SEO helps.

Prices and comparisons
The Steuerberatervergütungsverordnung (tax advisers' fee regulation) does not apply to bookkeepers; your prices are freely negotiable and may be advertised. Towards consumers, state final prices including VAT; with business clients, net prices with a note are common. Be careful with comparisons such as “cheaper than a tax adviser”: such a statement suggests the service is the same. It is not, so the comparison quickly becomes misleading.
Check before you publish
- Every service is described in the words of § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 StBerG or is clearly covered by it
- “Buchhaltung” or “Buchführung” in the name or logo has a visible restriction in words
- No terms with “Steuer” (tax) that suggest a power to advise
- Titles complete and correct, IHK qualifications with “Geprüft”
- Reviews with a note on how authenticity is checked, references only with consent
- Business card, letterhead, ads and platform profiles say the same as the website
Example pages for bookkeeping offices
See what a website with a clear service description and a visible restriction can look like, without feeling like small print.
Sources
- Gesetze im Internet – § 8 StBerG
- Gesetze im Internet – § 6 StBerG
- Haufe – BGH, judgment of 12.7.2001, I ZR 261/98
- Otto Schmidt – BGH, judgment of 25.6.2015, I ZR 145/14
- Betriebs-Berater – BFH, judgment of 7.6.2017, II R 22/15
- Gesetze im Internet – § 5b UWG
- Gesetze im Internet – annex to § 3 Abs. 3 UWG
- Gesetze im Internet – § 7 UWG
- Gesetze im Internet – § 132a StGB



